Issue |
J. Phys. IV France
Volume 10, Number PR11, November 2000
Fourth International Workshop on Ram Accelerators
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | Pr11-31 - Pr11-40 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/jp4:20001104 |
J. Phys. IV France 10 (2000) Pr11-31-Pr11-40
DOI: 10.1051/jp4:20001104
Progress of ram acceleration with ISL's RAMAC 30
F. Seiler, G. Patz, G. Smeets and J. SrulijesFrench-German Research Institute of Saint-Louis, ISL, 5 rue du Général Cassagnou, 68301 Saint-Louis, France
Abstract
Smeets [1] published in 1988 a new concept for a ram accelerator with guiding tube rails for firing rail
stabilized projectiles. This concept replaces Hertzbetg et al.'s [2] fin stabilized projectiles accelerated in a
cylindrical bore. The rail tube idea offers some advantages, e.g., no sabot is necessary as required for fin guided
projectiles, simple projectile geometry, and possibility of varying the inner tube geometry. This principle was tested
in 1993 and 1994 in rail tube version I and is now again under investigation since the beginning of 1997 in our
RAMAC 30 in version II. In the rail tube concept, circular and finless projectiles are guided in a ram-tube equipped
with five inner rails. At the moment we use a ram-section with a length of about 4.8 meters. A conventional
powder gun serves as pre-accelerator. In the gun tube with a length of 2.8 meters, projectiles of about 150 grams
are accelerated to a muzzle velocity of approximately 1800 m/s which is the initial velocity at the entrance of the
ram-section. For successful operating a ram accelerator, the heat release must be limited to avoid "thermal
choking" followed by an "unstart". This choking phenomenon will be investigated in detail in this paper from the
gasdynamic point of view in order to predict the right mixture for the given flow conditions around the ram
projectile. Moreover, to avoid a firing failure, the material point of view must also be considered. Some recent
firings have been done using aluminium, titanium and steel as test materials and its behaviour is discussed herein
in detail. The first outcome is for example, for a given projectile geometry and a given gas mixture with a steel
cowling no ignition occurs, whereas with aluminium or titanium as combustor surface material the ignition starts
well followed by a projectile acceleration.
© EDP Sciences 2000