Numéro |
J. Phys. IV France
Volume 107, May 2003
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 99 - 102 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/jp4:20030253 |
J. Phys. IV France 107 (2003) 99
DOI: 10.1051/jp4:20030253
Process studies on mercury fluxes over different soils with a Laboratory Flux Measurement System (LFMS)
E. Bahimann and R. EbinghausInstitute for Coastal Research/Physical and Chemical Analysis, GKSS Research Centre, Max-Planck-Strasse 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany
Abstract
A Laboratory Flux chamber System (LFCS) for process studies of the air/surface exchange of mercury
was developed. First results of flux studies for a variety of different soils will be presented. The system allows
investigating and controlling environmental variables that are thought to influence air/surface exchange
processes, SUCH as sunlight, air and soil temperature, air and soil humidity and turbulence conditions as well as
physicochemical conditions of the soil. The achievable detection limit for Total Gaseous Mercury (TGM) fluxes
defined as
is 0,02 ng/m
2/h.
For all soils under investigation we found a strong influence of radiation, soil-surface temperature and turbulence
on the momentum emission flux of mercury. Temperature differences between the soil surface and the air above
showed a moderate but still significant influence on the emission fluxes. First studies focusing on the influence of
soil moisture on mercury fluxes indicate, a decrease in mercury fluxes with decreasing soil moisture. This effect
seems to be more likely correlated with the soil moisture tension than the soil moisture content. Clear evidence
for a photoinduced increase in mercury fluxes for all soils could be revealed. Comparison of measured and
calculated fluxes (Figure 1, next page) derived from the temperature dependency of the mercury flux (F-TGM =
, x=T[ °C] ) showed good agreement for "dark-phases" but fails for "light"-phases within this time
series. This observation is probably due to an additional and enhanced photoinduced emission flux of mercury
during radiation phases.
Our results suggest, that for a given soil variations in mercury emissions fluxes can be explained by variations in
soil surface temperature, turbulence and radiation. A comparison of the fluxes obtained for different soils indicate
that the differences in fluxes are well correlated with the mercury concentrations in the soils.
© EDP Sciences 2003